A survey diagnostic that measures the frustration, precarity, and agency deficits in a workforce or union membership — the conditions demagogic messaging feeds on — and maps which grievances are most at risk of capture by scapegoating rhetoric. It now also scores whether the workforce's self-image is 'we who work' (ready to fight) or 'we the poor must work' (resigned), so each grievance is flagged as likely to be acted on or silently absorbed. This tells organizers not just which grievances to address first, but where narrative work must precede any mobilization ask.
The framework reveals a high-utility diagnostic tool that shifts union strategy from reactive mobilization to proactive narrative shaping. While theoretically grounded in sociology and psychology, its success depends on overcoming the 'quiescence' gap and ensuring the tool is used for empowerment rather than surveillance.
Strengths4
Weaknesses4
Opportunities3
Threats3
Essential for evaluating the internal methodological strengths of the audit against the external threats of political misuse or failure to shift perceptions. · Generated 2026-10-13 by cavi/gemma4-31b-it-awq-4bit-32kAI-generated