Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?
Chantal Mouffe · 2026 · 1300 citationsRead the paper
As testified by the increasing success of the extreme right in several countries, western societies are witnessing a growing disaffection with democratic institutions. Such a disaffection may have serious consequences for the future of democracy. Unfortunately, liberal democratic societies are ill-prepared to confront the present challenge, since they are unable to grasp its nature. One of the main reasons for this inability lies in the type of political theory currently in vogue, dominated as it is by an individualistic, uni-versalistic, and rationalistic framework. Such a framework erases the dimension of the political and impedes envisaging in an adequate manner the nature of a pluralistic democratic public sphere.
2 ideas Seedlabs derived from this research
A digital moderation framework for community forums that replaces 'consensus-seeking' algorithms with 'agonistic' structures, allowing conflicting viewpoints to coexist without being flagged as disruptive or filtered out by rationalist moderation bots.
AI score 51/100A digital deliberation tool for local governments that replaces rationalistic consensus-seeking with a framework for managing conflicting viewpoints (agonistic pluralism).
AI score 51/100