Cosmic variance of the local Hubble flow in large-scale cosmological simulations
Radosław Wojtak, Alexander Knebe, William A. Watson, Ilian T. Iliev, Steffen Heß, David Rapetti et al. · 2013 · 74 citationsRead the paper
The increasing precision in the determination of the Hubble parameter has reached a per cent level at which large-scale cosmic flows induced by inhomogeneities of the matter distribution become non-negligible. Here, we use large-scale cosmological N-body simulations to study statistical properties of the local Hubble parameter as measured by local observers. We show that the distribution of the local Hubble parameter depends not only on the scale of inhomogeneities, but also on how one defines the positions of observers in the cosmic web and what reference frame is used. Observers located in random dark matter haloes measure on average lower expansion rates than those at random positions in space or in the centres of cosmic voids, and this effect is stronger from the halo rest frames compared to the cosmic microwave background (CMB) rest frame. We compare the predictions for the local Hubble parameter with observational constraints based on Type Ia supernova (SNIa) and CMB observations. Due to cosmic variance, for observers located in random haloes we show that the Hubble constant determined from nearby SNIa may differ from that measured from the CMB by ±0.8 per cent at 1σ statistical significance. This scatter is too small to significantly alleviate a recently claimed discrepancy between current measurements assuming a flat Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model. However, for observers located in the centres of the largest voids permitted by the standard ΛCDM model, we find that Hubble constant measurements from SNIa would be biased high by 5 per cent, rendering this tension non-existent in this extreme case.
What the full text shows
Theory or simulation- Observers in random dark matter haloes measure a local Hubble constant that differs from the CMB measurement by a small margin at 1σ significance. — ±0.8% (Observers located in random haloes)
- Observers in the centers of the largest permitted voids in ΛCDM experience a significant high bias in Hubble constant measurements from SNIa. — 5% higher (Observers in the centers of the largest voids permitted by standard ΛCDM)
- Relative deviation from the global Hubble flow becomes very small at large observation radii. — 1% within 150h^-1 Mpc (Random observers in space)
- Observers in random haloes measure lower expansion rates than those in random space or void centers, with the effect amplified in the halo rest frame. (Comparison of observer positions and reference frames)
- Setup
- N-body simulations including the Jubilee volume ((6h^-1Gpc)^3) and Big MD ((2.5h^-1Gpc)^3), using haloes with masses Mhalo > 10^13h^-1Mpc.
- How
- The study uses large-scale cosmological N-body simulations to calculate the local Hubble parameter for various observer distributions. It compares these simulation results with linear perturbation theory and observational data from SNIa and CMB.
- Limitations
- The 0.8% scatter for random haloes is too small to resolve the current tension between SNIa and CMB measurements. · Linear approximation only recovers simulation results at scales rmax > 100h^-1 Mpc.
Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 7 Oct 2026. Read it