Seedlabs
Source research

Mini-Implants: When Orthodontists are Caught in their Own Web

Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral, Rodrigo César Santiago · 2012 · 5 citationsRead the paper

Introduction: Mini-implants are being extensively used in orthodontics, providing a new field of possibilities for treatment of the cases when a maximum anchorage is required.The procedure is critical during the insertion of miniimplants in the alveolar process between the roots of the tooth, and major complications can include contact and damage to adjacent tooth roots.Objective: The following case report describes a failure because of unintentional root damage after orthodontic mini-implant placement, resulting in longitudinal root fracture followed by extraction of the damaged mandibular second molar.Discussion: Factors which might have contributed to the irreversible iatrogenic injury associated with the use of mini-implants in a diabetic patient submitted to orthodontic treatment are discussed and analyzed.Conclusion: Although mini-implant placement has become a routine procedure in the orthodontic practice, it still represents an intrinsic risk to the process of insertion, which is the damage to adjacent structures.The placement of mini-implants must be carefully monitored, even in those cases which present low risk for iatrogenic injury.However much confident the professional may be, self-confidence in excess often leads to failure, provoking irreversible damages.

What the full text shows

Tested in real conditions
  • Unintentional mini-implant placement caused longitudinal root fracture and subsequent tooth extraction. (17-year-old male patient with type 1 diabetes; mini-implant placed in the interradicular space between the first and second mandibular molar)
  • Insufficient bone clearance around the mini-implant may contribute to root fracture. — 0.80 mm clearance vs. recommended 1 mm minimum (Interradicular space of 2.8 mm using a 1.2 mm diameter mini-implant)
  • High incidence of screw/tooth contact reported in literature for transalveolar mini-implants. — 27.1% (63/232) (General transalveolar mini-implant placement (cited from Fabbroni et al.))
Setup
Single 17-year-old male patient with type 1 diabetes; self-drilling mini-implant (1.2 mm diameter, 12 mm length).
How
Case report analyzing a clinical failure involving the placement of a self-drilling mini-implant for orthodontic distalization.
Limitations
Single case report · Small sample size (n=1)

Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 8 Oct 2026. Read it