Effect of Treatment with Twin-Block Appliances on Body Posture in Class II Malocclusion Subjects: A Prospective Clinical Study
Dalia Smailienė, Aistė Intienė, Irma Dobradziejutė, Gintaras Kušleika · 2017 · 24 citationsRead the paper
BACKGROUND There is strong evidence that malocclusion and body posture are interdependent. The relationship between improvement of nasopharyngeal airway, correction of malocclusion by orthodontic treatment or orthognathic surgery, and changes in body posture were evaluated in several studies. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the effect of the orthodontic treatment with Twin-block appliance on body posture. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study group consisted of 23 children (mean age 12.45 (1.06) years). They were orthopedically (back shape analysis) and orthodontically (cephalometric radiograph analysis) examined before the treatment with Twin-block appliance and 10-14 months after the beginning of treatment. RESULTS Treatment with Twin-block appliance caused mandibular protrusion as SNB increased by 0.91°, distance Ar-B increased by 4.9 mm, ANB decreased by 0.15°; and increase of face height. Oropharynx airway increased by 1.54 mm and deep pharynx airway by 1.08 mm. The decrease in kyphotic, lordotic, craniocervical angles, upper thoracic, pelvic, and trunk inclinations was found to be statistically significant. When comparing orthopedic measurements between study and control groups, no differences were detected. The control group also showed reduction of all measured angles. Although the decrease of kyphotic angle, upper thoracic inclination, trunk inclination, and craniocervical angle were more pronounced in the study group, the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, the body posture changes during treatment with Twin-block appliance were an expression of the physiological growth, not a response to improvement in occlusion.
What the full text shows
Tested in real conditions- Mandibular protrusion occurred, evidenced by increase in SNB angle and Ar-B distance. — SNB increased by 0.91°, Ar-B increased by 4.9 mm (Twin-block appliance treatment (10-14 months))
- Airway widths in the oropharynx and deep pharynx increased. — Oropharynx +1.54 mm, deep pharynx +1.08 mm (Twin-block appliance treatment (10-14 months))
- Reduction of the kyphotic angle was significantly greater in patients with higher ANB angle correction. — 9.22° reduction (ANB correction >1.2°) vs 2.71° reduction (ANB correction <1.2°) (Comparison between ANB group 1 and group 2)
- Body posture changes (reduction of kyphotic, lordotic, craniocervical angles, and thoracic/pelvic/trunk inclinations) were not significantly different from a non-cooperating control group. — No statistically significant difference between study and control groups (Comparison of treated patients vs. non-cooperating controls)
- Setup
- 23 children (mean age 12.45 years) in the study group and 14 children (mean age 12.73 years) in the control group.
- How
- Prospective clinical study using cephalometric radiograph analysis and photographic back shape analysis. Patients were treated with a modified Twin-block appliance and compared against a control group of non-cooperating patients.
- Limitations
- Small final sample size due to high dropout rate (45%) · Poor patient cooperation/compliance · Short-term follow-up (10-14 months)
Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 8 Oct 2026. Read it