3D Photogrammetry of Bat Skulls: Perspectives for Macro-evolutionary Analyses
Giada Giacomini, Dino Scaravelli, Anthony Herrel, Alessio Veneziano, Danilo Russo, Richard P. Brown et al. · 2019 · 55 citationsRead the paper
Photogrammetry (PH) is relatively cheap, easy to use, flexible and portable but its power and limitations have not been fully explored for studies of small animals. Here we assessed the accuracy of PH for the reconstruction of 3D digital models of bat skulls by evaluating its potential for evolutionary morphology studies at interspecific (19 species) level. Its reliability was assessed against the performance of micro CT scan (µCT) and laser scan techniques (LS). We used 3D geometric morphometrics and comparative methods to quantify the amount of size and shape variation due to the scanning technique and assess the strength of the biological signal in relation to both the technique error and phylogenetic uncertainty. We found only minor variation among techniques. Levels of random error (repeatability and procrustes variance) were similar in all techniques and no systematic error was observed (as evidenced from principal component analysis). Similar levels of phylogenetic signal, allometries and correlations with ecological variables (frequency of maximum energy and bite force) were detected among techniques. Phylogenetic uncertainty interacted with technique error but without affecting the biological conclusions driven by the evolutionary analyses. Our study confirms the accuracy of PH for the reconstruction of challenging specimens. These results encourage the use of PH as a reliable and highly accessible tool for the study of macro evolutionary processes of small mammals.
What the full text shows
Working prototype- Average surface distance between photogrammetry (PH) and laser scan (LS) models was low. — 0.041 mm (19 bat skull specimens)
- Average surface distance between photogrammetry (PH) and micro CT (μCT) models was low. — 0.054 mm (19 bat skull specimens)
- Centroid size vectors showed extremely high correlation across all technique combinations. — R > 0.99, p < 0.001 (PH, LS, and μCT models)
- Repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficients) was high and similar across all techniques. — 0.97–0.99 (Subsample of 9 species)
- Principal Component Analysis showed samples clustered by species/individual rather than by scanning technique. (111 models (57 specimens + 54 replicates))
- PH provided similar parameter estimates for allometry, phylogenetic signal, and ecological correlations as μCT and LS. (Macro-evolutionary analyses of 19 species)
- Setup
- 19 bat species with an average skull length of 15.62 mm; 111 total models including replicates for 9 species.
- How
- The researchers reconstructed 3D models of bat skulls using photogrammetry (DSLR camera with macro lens), laser scanning, and micro CT scanning. They compared the techniques using mesh distance analysis, 3D geometric morphometrics (PCA), and phylogenetic comparative methods.
- Limitations
- Landmark identification was difficult in specimens with attached cartilage tissue (e.g., M. capaccinii). · The study did not specifically test for inter-operator bias.
Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 8 Oct 2026. Read it