Finite element modeling of the periodontal ligament under a realistic kinetic loading of the jaw system
Alireza Karimi, Reza Razaghi, Hasan Biglari, Seyed Mohammadali Rahmati, Alix Sandbothe, Mojtaba Haji Hasani · 2019 · 32 citationsRead the paper
PURPOSE: ., chewing, are difficult to be determined numerically as the mechanical properties of the PDL is variably present in different finite element (FE) models. This study was aimed to conduct a dynamic finite element (FE) simulation to investigate the role of the PDL (PDL) material models in the induced stresses and deformations using a simplified patient-specific FE model of a human jaw system. METHODS: To do that, a realistic kinetic loading of chewing was applied to the incisor point, contralateral, and ipsilateral condyles, through the experimentally proven trajectory approach. Three different material models, including the elasto-plastic, hyperelastic, and viscoelastic, were assigned to the PDL, and the resulted stresses of the tooth FE model were computed and compared. RESULTS: The results revealed the highest von Mises stress of 620.14 kPa and the lowest deformation of 0.16 mm in the PDL when using the hyperelastic model. The concentration of the stress in the elastoplastic and viscoelastic models was in the mid-root and apex of the PDL, while for the hyperelastic model, it was concentrated in the cervical margin. The highest deformation in the PDL regardless of the employed material model was located in the caudal direction of the tooth. The viscoelastic PDL absorbed the transmitted energy from the dentine and led to lower stress in the cancellous bone compared to the elastoplastic and hyperelastic material models. CONCLUSION: These results have implications not only for understanding the stresses and deformations in the PDL under chewing but also for providing comprehensive information for the medical and biomechanical experts in regard of the role of the material models being used to address the mechanical behavior of the PDL in other components of the tooth.
What the full text shows
Shown in the lab- The hyperelastic PDL model produced the highest von Mises stress and the lowest deformation. — 620.14 kPa stress; 0.16 mm deformation (During the clenching phase of chewing simulation)
- The elasto-plastic and viscoelastic PDL models produced lower stresses than the hyperelastic model. — 388.30 kPa (elasto-plastic) and 192.14 kPa (viscoelastic) (During the clenching phase of chewing simulation)
- The viscoelastic PDL model reduced stress transmission to the cancellous bone compared to elasto-plastic and hyperelastic models. (Under realistic kinetic loading of chewing)
- Deformation in the PDL was consistently highest in the caudal direction regardless of the material model. — 0.16 to 0.23 mm (Across all three material models during chewing simulation)
- Stress concentration locations varied by material model: cervical margin for hyperelastic, and mid-root/apex for elasto-plastic and viscoelastic. (During the clenching phase of chewing simulation)
- Setup
- Simplified patient-specific FE model including enamel, dentine, pulp, PDL (0.20 mm thickness), cancellous, and cortical bones, using hexahedral elements and cornflakes bio as food.
- How
- A patient-specific 3D finite element model of the human jaw was developed and simulated using LS-DYNA. Realistic kinetic loading was applied via a trajectory approach mimicking chewing, comparing three PDL material models: elasto-plastic, hyperelastic, and viscoelastic.
- Limitations
- Simplified anatomical dimensions were used for tooth components. · The model used a simplified patient-specific geometry rather than a fully detailed individual anatomy. · Simulation was limited to the clenching part of the chewing cycle to reduce computation time.
Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 8 Oct 2026. Read it