Seedlabs
Source research

Novel Urethane-Dimethacrylate Monomers and Compositions for Use as Matrices in Dental Restorative Materials

Izabela Maria Barszczewska-Rybarek, Marta Chrószcz-Porębska, Grzegorz Chladek · 2020 · 60 citationsRead the paper

In this study, novel urethane-dimethacrylate monomers were synthesized from 1,3-bis(1-isocyanato-1-methylethyl)benzene (MEBDI) and oligoethylene glycols monomethacrylates, containing one to three oxyethylene groups. They can potentially be utilized as matrices in dental restorative materials. The obtained monomers were used to prepare four new formulations. Two of them were solely composed of the MEBDI-based monomers. In a second pair, a monomer based on triethylene glycol monomethacrylate, used in 20 wt.%, was replaced with triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), a reactive diluent typically used in dental materials. For comparison purposes, two formulations, using typical dental dimethacrylates (bisphenol A glycerolate dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA), urethane-dimethacrylate (UDMA) and TEGDMA) were prepared. The monomers and mixtures were tested for the viscosity and density. The homopolymers and copolymers, obtained via photopolymerization, were tested for the degree of conversion, polymerization shrinkage, water sorption and solubility, hardness, flexural strength and modulus. The newly developed formulations achieved promising physico-chemical and mechanical characteristics so as to be suitable for applications as dental composite matrices. A combination of the MEBDI-based urethane-dimethacrylates with TEGDMA resulted in copolymers with a high degree of conversion, low polymerization shrinkage, low water sorption and water solubility, and good mechanical properties. These parameters showed an improvement in relation to currently used dental formulations.

What the full text shows

Shown in the lab
  • MEBDI-based copolymers generally exhibited higher degree of conversion (DC) than dental dimethacrylate copolymers. (Compared to Bis-G:T and Bis-G:U:T)
  • MEBDI-based copolymers generally showed lower polymerization shrinkage (S) than dental formulations. (HM:DM:T had the statistically lowest S)
  • MEBDI-based copolymers containing TEGDMA exhibited the lowest water sorption (WS). — All < 40 µg/mm³ (ISO 4049 limit) (Compared to dental copolymers and TM-based copolymers)
  • MEBDI-based copolymers showed higher flexural modulus (E) than all dental copolymers. (Statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05))
  • MEBDI-based copolymers generally exhibited higher flexural strength (σ) than dental copolymers. (Except for HM:T)
  • MEBDI-based monomers showed density values similar to Bis-GMA and higher than UDMA and TEGDMA. — 1.12 to 1.15 g/cm³
Setup
Four new MEBDI-based formulations and two standard dental formulations (Bis-G:T and Bis-G:U:T) were compared across viscosity, density, DC, shrinkage, water sorption, solubility, and mechanical strength.
How
Synthesized three novel urethane-dimethacrylate monomers (HM, DM, TM) from MEBDI and oligoethylene glycol monomethacrylates. These were tested as homopolymers and copolymers (mixed with each other or TEGDMA) via photoinitiated polymerization using a CQ/DMAEMA system.
Limitations
HM and DM monomers have excessive viscosity for use as stand-alone matrices. · TM homopolymer exhibits excessive water sorption (15% above ISO 4049 limit).

Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 7 Oct 2026. Read it