Updated cost-effectiveness of MDMA-assisted therapy for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: Findings from a phase 3 trial
Elliot A. Marseille, Jennifer Mitchell, James G. Kahn · 2022 · 50 citationsRead the paper
BACKGROUND: Severe posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent and debilitating condition in the United States. and globally. Using pooled efficacy data from six phase 2 trials, therapy using 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) appeared cost-saving from a payer's perspective. This study updates the cost-effectiveness analysis of this novel therapy using data from a new phase 3 trial, including the incremental cost-effectiveness of the more intensive phase 3 regimen compared with the shorter phase 2 regimen. METHODS: We adapted a previously-published Markov model to portray the costs and health benefits of providing MDMA-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) to patients with chronic, severe, or extreme PTSD in a recent phase 3 trial, compared with standard care. Inputs were based on trial results and published literature. The trial treated 90 patients with a clinician administered PTSD scale (CAPS-5) total severity score of 35 or greater at baseline, and duration of PTSD symptoms of 6 months or longer. The primary outcome was assessed 8 weeks after the final experimental session. Patients received three 90-minute preparatory psychotherapy sessions, three 8-hour active MDMA or placebo sessions, and nine 90-minute integrative psychotherapy sessions. Our model calculates the per-patient cost of MDMA-AT, net all-cause medical costs, mortality, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We reported results from the U.S. health care payer's perspective for multiple analytic time horizons, (base-case is 30 years), and conducted extensive sensitivity analyses. Costs and QALYs were discounted by 3% annually. Costs were adjusted to 2020 U.S. dollars according to the medical component of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index (CPI). RESULTS: MDMA-AT as conducted in the phase 3 trial costs $11,537 per patient. Compared to standard of care for 1,000 patients, MDMA-AT generates discounted net health care savings of $132.9 million over 30 years, accruing 4,856 QALYs, and averting 61.4 premature deaths. MDMA-AT breaks even on cost at 3.8 years while delivering 887 QALYs. A third MDMA session generates additional medical savings and health benefits compared with a two-session regimen. Hypothetically assuming no savings in health care costs, MDMA-AT has an ICER of $2,384 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: MDMA-AT provided to patients with severe or extreme chronic PTSD is cost-saving from a payer's perspective, while delivering substantial clinical benefit.
What the full text shows
Working prototype- MDMA-AT generates net health care savings over 30 years for a cohort of 1,000 patients. — $132.9 million discounted savings (Compared to standard of care for patients with severe or extreme PTSD)
- MDMA-AT reduces premature deaths over a 30-year horizon. — 61.4 deaths averted (Cohort of 1,000 patients)
- MDMA-AT increases quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 30 years. — 4,856 discounted QALYs gained (Cohort of 1,000 patients)
- The cost of the MDMA-AT intervention per patient. — $11,537 (Phase 3 protocol (three 8-hour active sessions))
- The three-session phase 3 protocol is more cost-effective than the two-session phase 2 protocol over 30 years. — 608 additional QALYs and $32.0 million in additional savings (Compared to two-session regimen for 1,000 patients)
- Time required for the intervention to break even in costs. — 3.8 years (Base-case analysis)
- Setup
- Phase 3 trial data from 90 patients with severe or extreme PTSD (CAPS-5 score ≥ 35) and symptoms lasting ≥ 6 months.
- How
- A Markov model was used to simulate costs and health benefits over 30 years for a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients. Inputs were derived from a phase 3 trial, including EQ-5D-5L utility scores and micro-costing of service delivery.
- Limitations
- Long-term durability of benefits beyond 3.5 years is unknown. · Model assumes patients remain in the final severity category achieved at trial end (base-case). · Relative mortality risks are based on published literature rather than trial data.
Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 7 Oct 2026. Read it