Seedlabs
Source research

Designing for Confidence: The Impact of Visualizing Artificial Intelligence Decisions

Alexander J. Karran, Théophile Demazure, Antoine Hudon, Sylvain Sénécal, Pierre‐Majorique Léger · 2022 · 54 citationsRead the paper

Explainable artificial intelligence aims to bring transparency to artificial intelligence (AI) systems by translating, simplifying, and visualizing its decisions. While society remains skeptical about AI systems, studies show that transparent and explainable AI systems can help improve the Human-AI trust relationship. This manuscript presents two studies that assess three AI decision visualization attribution models that manipulate morphological clarity (MC) and two information presentation-order methods to determine each visualization’s impact on the Human-AI trust relationship through increased confidence and cognitive fit (CF). The first study, N = 206 (Avg. age = 37.87 ± 10.51, Male = 123), utilized information presentation methods and visualizations delivered through an online experiment to explore trust in AI by asking participants to complete a visual decision-making task. The second study, N = 19 (24.9 ± 8.3 years old, Male = 10), utilized eye-tracking technology and the same stimuli presentation methods to investigate if cognitive load, inferred through pupillometry measures, mediated the confidence-trust relationship. The results indicate that low MC positively impacts Human-AI trust and that the presentation order of information within an interface in terms of adjacency further influences user trust in AI. We conclude that while adjacency and MC significantly affect cognitive load, cognitive load alone does not mediate the confidence-trust relationship. Our findings interpreted through a combination of CF, situation awareness, and ecological interface design have implications for the design of future AI systems, which may facilitate better collaboration between humans and AI-based decision agents.

What the full text shows

Shown in the lab
  • Adjacent AI explanations (overlaid on the original image) significantly increase user confidence compared to non-adjacent explanations. (Across all morphological clarity (MC) levels)
  • Low morphological clarity (MC) visualizations result in the highest user confidence. (Compared to medium and high MC levels)
  • In non-adjacent presentation settings, low MC results in higher confidence than medium or high MC. (Non-adjacent EV presentation)
  • Cognitive load decreases as morphological clarity increases when using adjacent visualizations. (Adjacent visualizations)
  • Cognitive load does not mediate the relationship between confidence and trust. (Pupillometry measures in Study 2)
Setup
Study 1: N=206, 50 trials per participant. Study 2: N=19, 60 trials per participant using Tobii X60 eye tracker.
How
Two within-subject factorial experiments (2x3 design) testing adjacency (adjacent vs. non-adjacent) and morphological clarity (low-cloud of points, medium-heatmap, high-outline). Study 1 used online surveys for confidence ratings, and Study 2 used eye-tracking (pupillometry) to measure cognitive load.
Limitations
Did not control for the degree of visual similarity between image pairs. · Did not include demographic data or individual propensity to trust AI in the model. · Did not control for different algorithm types/designs beyond the explanation method. · Explanations are technically relevant to the model but not necessarily human-readable (lack of 'causability').

Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 8 Oct 2026. Read it