Automated morphological phenotyping using learned shape descriptors and functional maps: A novel approach to geometric morphometrics
Oshane O. Thomas, Hongyu Shen, Ryan L. Raaum, William E. H. Harcourt‐Smith, John D. Polk, Mark Hasegawa‐Johnson · 2023 · 15 citationsRead the paper
The methods of geometric morphometrics are commonly used to quantify morphology in a broad range of biological sciences. The application of these methods to large datasets is constrained by manual landmark placement limiting the number of landmarks and introducing observer bias. To move the field forward, we need to automate morphological phenotyping in ways that capture comprehensive representations of morphological variation with minimal observer bias. Here, we present Morphological Variation Quantifier (morphVQ), a shape analysis pipeline for quantifying, analyzing, and exploring shape variation in the functional domain. morphVQ uses descriptor learning to estimate the functional correspondence between whole triangular meshes in lieu of landmark configurations. With functional maps between pairs of specimens in a dataset we can analyze and explore shape variation. morphVQ uses Consistent ZoomOut refinement to improve these functional maps and produce a new representation of shape variation, area-based and conformal (angular) latent shape space differences (LSSDs). We compare this new representation of shape variation to shape variables obtained via manual digitization and auto3DGM, an existing approach to automated morphological phenotyping. We find that LSSDs compare favorably to modern 3DGM and auto3DGM while being more computationally efficient. By characterizing whole surfaces, our method incorporates more morphological detail in shape analysis. We can classify known biological groupings, such as Genus affiliation with comparable accuracy. The shape spaces produced by our method are similar to those produced by modern 3DGM and to auto3DGM, and distinctiveness functions derived from LSSDs show us how shape variation differs between groups. morphVQ can capture shape in an automated fashion while avoiding the limitations of manually digitized landmarks, and thus represents a novel and computationally efficient addition to the geometric morphometrics toolkit.
What the full text shows
Working prototype- Conformal LSSDs showed high correlation with ground-truth 21-landmark representations. — r = 0.621 (102 hominoid cuboid meshes)
- Conformal LSSDs achieved high accuracy in classifying specimen genus. — 98.2% accuracy (Logistic regression classification task)
- Consistent ZoomOut refinement improved bijective coverage of P2P maps. — 4% to 12% improvement (Hominoid cuboid meshes)
- The pipeline is more computationally efficient than auto3DGM for quantifying shape variation. — ~1.7 days vs 31.66 days (105 cuboid meshes)
- LSSD shape variables perform as well as or better than 3DGM and auto3DGM in capturing shape variation. (Hominoid cuboid dataset)
- Setup
- 102 hominoid cuboid meshes (2,000-390,000 vertices, normalized to 12,000), 26 hominoid medial cuneiforms, and 33 mouse humeri.
- How
- The morphVQ pipeline uses a Siamese neural network with a Harmonic Surface Network (HSN) feature extractor to learn shape descriptors and estimate functional maps between triangular meshes. These maps are refined using Consistent ZoomOut and analyzed via Limit Shape-based statistical shape analysis to produce area-based and conformal latent shape space differences (LSSDs).
- Limitations
- Requires initial rigid alignment to avoid extrinsic symmetries. · Performance on featureless surfaces (e.g., humeral shafts) is a known challenge for FM-based methods, though coverage remained high in this study.
Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 8 Oct 2026. Read it