Seedlabs
Source research

Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment for Treatment Monitoring Adds Value to PSA in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Christopher J. Sweeney, Russell Petry, Chang Xu, Merrida A. Childress, Jie He, David A. Fabrizio et al. · 2024 · 38 citationsRead the paper

PURPOSE: Enzalutamide after abiraterone progression is commonly used in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer despite a low rate of clinical benefit. Analyzing IMbassador250, a phase III trial assessing enzalutamide with or without atezolizumab after abiraterone, we hypothesized that baseline and early changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tumor fraction (TF) may identify patients more likely to exhibit survival benefit from enzalutamide. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: ctDNA was quantified from plasma samples using a tissue-agnostic assay without buffy coat sequencing. Baseline ctDNA TF, changes in ctDNA TF from baseline to cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), and detection at C3D1 alone were compared with overall response rate, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), median OS (mOS), and 50% reduction in PSA. RESULTS: ctDNA TF detection at baseline and/or C3D1 was associated with shorter rPFS and OS in 494 evaluable patients. Detection of ctDNA TF at C3D1, with or without detection at cycle 1 day 1, was associated with worse rPFS and mOS than lack of detection. When ctDNA TF and PSA response at C3D1 were discordant, patients with (ctDNA TF undetected/PSA not reduced) had more favorable outcomes than (ctDNA TF detected/PSA reduced; mOS 22.1 vs. 16 months; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide after abiraterone, we demonstrate the utility of a new tissue-agnostic assay for monitoring molecular response based on ctDNA TF detection and dynamics. ctDNA TF provides a minimally invasive, complementary biomarker to PSA testing and may refine personalized treatment approaches.

What the full text shows

Tested in real conditions
  • Baseline ctDNA TF detection is associated with significantly worse rPFS and OS. — median rPFS 4.6 vs 11.4 months; median OS 13.6 vs 22.5 months (Patients receiving enzalutamide after abiraterone progression)
  • Detection of ctDNA TF at C3D1 is a strong predictor of poor outcomes. — HR 3.16 for rPFS; HR 5.33 for OS (Patients receiving enzalutamide after abiraterone progression)
  • Discordant results at C3D1 show ctDNA TF is more predictive of survival than PSA. — mOS 22.1 months (ctDNA undetected/PSA not reduced) vs 16 months (ctDNA detected/PSA reduced) (Discordant ctDNA TF and PSA response at C3D1)
  • ctDNA TF at C3D1 provides higher prognostic concordance for OS than PSA50. — C-index 0.64 vs 0.57 (mCRPC patients on enzalutamide)
  • ctDNA TF can risk stratify patients with ambiguous imaging and PSA results. — mOS 12.9 months (detected) vs not reached (undetected) (No radiographic progression but lack of PSA reduction)
Setup
494 evaluable patients (408 in the biomarker-evaluable population) with mCRPC who progressed on abiraterone and received enzalutamide.
How
Retrospective analysis of banked plasma from a phase III trial using the FoundationOne Monitor tissue-agnostic NGS assay to quantify ctDNA tumor fraction (TF) via aneuploidy, variant allele frequency, and fragment lengths. Results were compared against rPFS, OS, and PSA response (≥50% reduction).
Limitations
Analyses were largely exploratory. · Restricted to mCRPC patients. · Monitoring limited to a single on-treatment timepoint (C3D1).

Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 8 Oct 2026. Read it