Seedlabs
Source research

Expert opinions on implementation of MDMA-assisted therapy in Europe: critical appraisal towards training, clinical practice, and regulation

Jerome Herpers, Natalie Maximets, Noah van Dongen, Josjan Zijlmans, Eric Vermetten · 2024 · 7 citationsRead the paper

Introduction: The positive results of MDMA from Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in MDMA-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) call for a critical evaluation of its regulatory status within the European mental healthcare system. This is driven by the recent submission of MDMA-AT for FDA approval in the United States. Unless coordinated efforts in the European regulatory landscape start, there may be potential divergences in national regulatory strategies. Gaining insights from researchers and clinicians involved in the application of MDMA-AT may be useful in guiding the discussion of factors involved in its implementation.Method: A comprehensive invitation-only survey was sent to researchers and clinicians involved in MDMA-AT clinical trials and contributors to the scientific literature on MDMA-AT from around the globe. This study aimed to collect opinions on clinical practices, training, and regulation worldwide, examining the global best practices and pitfalls to outline strategies for possible European implementation of MDMA-AT.Results: The survey, which included responses from 68 experts, yielded a range of opinions where a large majority endorsed the need for training and standardization, emphasizing equity and access, stressing impediments in the national approval processes, and reflecting critically on anticipated spill-over effects of MDMA-AT in clinical settings.Conclusion: The experts highlight the need for science-informed policy development, active regulatory involvement, and international cooperation to incorporate MDMA-AT into the European mental healthcare system in general and the treatment of PTSD in particular. The study emphasizes the importance of ongoing research, open professional discourse, and collaborative engagement to facilitate MDMA-AT's ethical and effective implementation.

What the full text shows

Shown in the lab
  • Experts believe current regulatory status is not aligned with scientific evidence. — 49% of respondents (Global experts in MDMA-AT)
  • Strong consensus that specialized training is mandatory for therapists providing MDMA-AT. — 88% of respondents (Global experts in MDMA-AT)
  • Experts predict a positive effect on the mental health landscape, specifically for treatment-resistant PTSD. — 88% positive impact / 87% for TR-PTSD (Global experts in MDMA-AT)
  • Long-term follow-up data is perceived as the most critical missing information for regulatory approval. — 71% marked as essential or very important (Global experts in MDMA-AT)
  • Insufficient therapist training is identified as the primary risk following potential approval. — 79% of respondents (Global experts in MDMA-AT)
  • Preference for 'Expanded Access' as the most popular interim approach before full registration. — 43% of respondents (Global experts in MDMA-AT)
Setup
68 experts (from an initial 108 contacted) including psychiatrists, therapists, and researchers primarily from Europe (Netherlands, UK), North America, and Israel.
How
An invitation-only online survey was distributed to clinical researchers, therapists, and scientists involved in MDMA-AT. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ChatGPT-4 for summarizing open-ended responses.
Limitations
Potential funder bias from experts affiliated with industry partners (e.g., MAPS, Lykos Therapeutics). · Limited survey options for ethical concerns, specifically only one option for informed consent. · Subjectivity inherent in expert opinion surveys.

Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 8 Oct 2026. Read it