Where do neurodevelopmental conditions fit in transdiagnostic psychiatric frameworks? Incorporating a new neurodevelopmental spectrum
Giorgia Michelini, Christina O. Carlisi, Nicholas R. Eaton, Jed T. Elison, John David Haltigan, Roman Kotov et al. · 2024 · 84 citationsRead the paper
Features of autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, learning disorders, intellectual disabilities, and communication and motor disorders usually emerge early in life and are associated with atypical neurodevelopment. These "neurodevelopmental conditions" are grouped together in the DSM-5 and ICD-11 to reflect their shared characteristics. Yet, reliance on categorical diagnoses poses significant challenges in both research and clinical settings (e.g., high co-occurrence, arbitrary diagnostic boundaries, high within-disorder heterogeneity). Taking a transdiagnostic dimensional approach provides a useful alternative for addressing these limitations, accounting for shared underpinnings across neurodevelopmental conditions, and characterizing their common co-occurrence and developmental continuity with other psychiatric conditions. Neurodevelopmental features have not been adequately considered in transdiagnostic psychiatric frameworks, although this would have fundamental implications for research and clinical practices. Growing evidence from studies on the structure of neurodevelopmental and other psychiatric conditions indicates that features of neurodevelopmental conditions cluster together, delineating a "neurodevelopmental spectrum" ranging from normative to impairing profiles. Studies on shared genetic underpinnings, overlapping cognitive and neural profiles, and similar developmental course and efficacy of support/treatment strategies indicate the validity of this neurodevelopmental spectrum. Further, characterizing this spectrum alongside other psychiatric dimensions has clinical utility, as it provides a fuller view of an individual's needs and strengths, and greater prognostic utility than diagnostic categories. Based on this compelling body of evidence, we argue that incorporating a new neurodevelopmental spectrum into transdiagnostic frameworks has considerable potential for transforming our understanding, classification, assessment, and clinical practices around neurodevelopmental and other psychiatric conditions.
What the full text shows
Working prototype- A neurodevelopmental factor capturing ADHD features in early childhood predicted pre-adolescent psychopathology and functioning more strongly than DSM categorical diagnoses. — about 2 times more strongly (Three cohorts (N=1,253))
- A broad childhood neurodevelopmental factor predicted adult mood problems more stably and to a larger extent than narrow motor and cognitive dimensions. (UK birth cohort (N=10,054))
- A neurodevelopmental factor was associated with reduced fetal growth to a greater extent than internalizing, externalizing, psychosis, and general psychopathology factors. (Swedish population study (N=1,093,788))
- Clinicians report a preference for and greater acceptability, feasibility, and clinical utility of a transdiagnostic dimensional approach over categorical diagnosis. (Child and adult patients, including those with ADHD)
- Setup
- Multiple datasets including a Swedish population study (N=1,093,788), a UK birth cohort (N=10,054), and three smaller cohorts (N=1,253).
- How
- The paper synthesizes existing longitudinal, population-based, and clinical evidence to argue for a transdiagnostic dimensional spectrum for neurodevelopmental conditions. It reviews data from large-scale cohorts and practitioner ratings to compare dimensional models against DSM/ICD categorical systems.
- Limitations
- Reliance on existing literature rather than a single new empirical trial · Need for further implementation work to standardize clinical protocols
Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 3 Oct 2026. Read it