Seedlabs
Source research

Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape

Willem Elbers, Alejandro Avilés, H. E. Noriega, D. Chebat, A. Menegas, Carlos S. Frenk et al. · 2025 · 77 citationsRead the paper

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Collaboration has obtained robust measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations in the redshift range 0.1 < z < 4.2 , based on the Lyman- α forest and galaxies from data release 2. We combine these measurements with cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope to place our tightest constraints yet on the sum of neutrino masses. Assuming the cosmological Λ CDM model and three degenerate neutrino states, we find ∑ m ν < 0.0642 eV (95%) with a marginalized error of σ ( ∑ m ν ) = 0.020 eV . We also constrain the effective number of neutrino species, finding N eff = 3.2 3 − 0.34 + 0.35 (95%), in line with the Standard Model prediction. When accounting for neutrino oscillation constraints, we find a preference for the normal mass ordering and an upper limit on the lightest neutrino mass of m l < 0.023 eV (95%). However, we determine using frequentist and Bayesian methods that our constraints are in tension with the lower limits derived from neutrino oscillations. Correcting for the physical boundary at zero mass, we report a 95% Feldman-Cousins upper limit of ∑ m ν < 0.053 eV , breaching the lower limit from neutrino oscillations. Considering a more general Bayesian analysis with an effective cosmological neutrino mass parameter, ∑ m ν , eff , that allows for negative energy densities and removes unsatisfactory prior weight effects, we derive constraints that are in 3 σ tension with the same oscillation limit, while the error rises to σ ( ∑ m ν , eff ) = 0.053 eV . In the absence of unknown systematics, this finding could be interpreted as a hint of new physics not necessarily related to neutrinos. The preference of DESI and CMB data for an evolving dark energy model offers one possible solution. In the w 0 w a CDM model, we find ∑ m ν < 0.163 eV (95%), relaxing the neutrino tension. These constraints all rely on the effects of neutrinos on the cosmic expansion history. Using full-shape power spectrum measurements of data release 1 galaxies, we place complementary constraints that rely on neutrino free streaming. Our strongest such limit in Λ CDM , using selected CMB priors, is ∑ m ν < 0.193 eV (95%).

What the full text shows

Tested in real conditions
  • Upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses in the ΛCDM model — < 0.0642 eV (95%) (DESI DR2 BAO combined with CMB data)
  • Upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses in the w0waCDM model — < 0.163 eV (95%) (DESI DR2 BAO combined with CMB data)
  • Constraint on the effective number of neutrino species — Neff = 3.23 - 0.34 + 0.35 (95%) (DESI DR2 BAO and CMB data)
  • Upper limit on the lightest neutrino mass — ml < 0.023 eV (95%) (Accounting for neutrino oscillation constraints)
  • Feldman-Cousins upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses — < 0.053 eV (95%) (ΛCDM model, correcting for physical boundary at zero mass)
  • Tension between cosmological limits and neutrino oscillation lower limits — 2.7σ to 4.0σ (Assuming ΛCDM)
Setup
Data from DESI DR2 BAO (redshift 0.1 < z < 4.2), DESI DR1 full-shape clustering, and CMB data from Planck and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope.
How
The study combines Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements from DESI DR2 and DR1 full-shape clustering with CMB data. It employs both Bayesian and frequentist (Feldman-Cousins) statistical analyses across ΛCDM and w0waCDM cosmological models.
Limitations
Constraints in ΛCDM are in tension with neutrino oscillation lower limits · Results are sensitive to prior weight effects in Bayesian analysis · Potential unidentified systematic errors

Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 7 Oct 2026. Read it