Seedlabs
Source research

Referrals and utilization of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes at a regional medical center in Kentucky

Ömer Ataç, George C. Bryant, William B Burrows, Kory Heier, James W. Keck, Key C Douthitt et al. · 2025 · 4 citationsRead the paper

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to examine referral and attendance patterns for diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) among patients with both type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) at a regional medical center in Kentucky, and to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with these outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed electronic health records of adults with diabetes (n = 10,587; n = 817 with T1D and n = 9,770 with T2D) who received care from 1/1/2016-12/31/2019 at University of Kentucky HealthCare. We compared DSMES referral and attendance rates by various demographic and clinical factors and used logistic regression models to examine the association between these factors and DSMES referrals/attendance. RESULTS: DSMES referrals were made for 6.9% (n = 726) of our sample, and 40.2% (n = 292) of those referred attended DSMES. Referral rates were 11.6% for T1D and 6.5% for T2D. Attendance rates were 41.1% for T1D and 40.1% for T2D. Referrals was more common among females (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.42-1.96), non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic individuals (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.12-1.65 and OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03-2.35), and less common among those aged 65+ (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.48), those with public insurance (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.88), and rural residents (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.40-0.57). Patients with obesity (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.71) and ≥ 9% A1C (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.65-3.34) were also more likely to be referred. No factors were associated with DSMES attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clear guidelines recommending DSMES referrals for patients with diabetes, DSMES referral rates were low, and less than half of patients who were referred ultimately attended DSMES. Variation in referral rates across demographic and clinical characteristics highlights opportunities to improve and standardize referral processes.

What the full text shows

Tested in real conditions
  • Overall DSMES referral rate was low. — 6.9% (n = 726) (Adult patients with diabetes at a regional medical center in Kentucky)
  • Attendance rate among those referred to DSMES was less than half. — 40.2% (n = 292) (Adult patients with diabetes at a regional medical center in Kentucky)
  • Referral rates differed by diabetes type. — 11.6% for T1D vs. 6.5% for T2D (Adult patients with diabetes at a regional medical center in Kentucky)
  • Higher A1C levels were strongly associated with increased likelihood of referral. — OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.65-3.34) for A1C ≥ 9% (Adult patients with diabetes at a regional medical center in Kentucky)
  • Rural residency and public insurance were associated with lower referral rates. — OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.40-0.57) for rural; OR 0.75 (95% CI 0.63-0.88) for public insurance (Adult patients with diabetes at a regional medical center in Kentucky)
  • Urban residency was the only variable associated with higher attendance rates. — 43.0% urban vs. 34.1% rural (Patients referred to DSMES)
Setup
10,587 adult patients (817 T1D, 9,770 T2D) with at least 365 days of follow-up at University of Kentucky HealthCare (2016-2019).
How
Retrospective analysis of electronic health records using chi-squared tests and logistic regression models to examine associations between demographic/clinical factors and DSMES referral and attendance.
Limitations
Data limited to a single regional academic medical center. · DSMES completion (persistence) was not measured, only initial attendance. · Referral data based on internal EHR workflow. · Exclusion of patients missing BMI or A1C data.

Summarized by Gemma 4 from the open-access full text · 18 Oct 2026. Read it